AFOQT · Its own composite
Situational Judgment
Situational Judgment is the AFOQT subtest in which you read a situation from a junior officer's work and judge which of five actions is the most effective and which is the least effective.
- Situations
- 25
- Items
- 50 (two judgments per situation)
- Time
- 35 minutes
- Answer options
- 5 actions
- Composites
- Situational Judgment
Screens of the trainer
The subtest
Measures
The subtest measures judgment and decision-making in the interpersonal situations junior officers meet at work. The situations are based on real ones met by junior officers, and they call on six competencies: integrity and professionalism, leadership, resource management, communication, innovation and mentoring.
It feeds its own Situational Judgment composite, which no other subtest feeds. It counts toward none of the Pilot, CSO, ABM, Academic Aptitude, Verbal or Quantitative composites.
Format
The subtest has 25 situations in 35 minutes, two judgments each, for 50 items.
Scoring
Answers are scored against the consensus judgment of experienced officers. Two of the five actions can be keyed as equally effective.
Each judgment scores from −1 to +1.
Item types
A situation, five actions
A situation is a paragraph of four to six sentences on an interpersonal problem a junior officer meets at work. Five actions follow, one sentence each, and the same five serve both judgments.
Free practice test
Scenario 1 of 5
You have just taken over a flight of twelve people. Your predecessor let three senior members set their own shifts, which left the other nine covering the least popular hours. Nobody has filed a complaint, but two of the nine have asked you when the schedule will be rebuilt. Your flight chief tells you the arrangement has held for two years, that the flight works well, and that nothing in the three members' duties requires those particular hours.
Mark the most effective and the least effective action.
Show the answer
Most effective: Build a fairer rotation with your flight chief and explain the reasoning to the flight
Least effective: Tell the two members who asked that the shift split was set before you arrived
Rebuilding the rotation with the flight chief, then explaining it to the flight, fixes the split with the person who knows the workload.
Telling the two who asked that the split predates you dodges a schedule that is now yours to set.
Asking each member first comes close, and costs only a few days.
Scenario 2 of 5
You are a captain. A second lieutenant who took over a flight three weeks ago shows you a list of five changes that he drew up over the weekend and wants to announce on Monday, from a new duty roster to a new way of running the morning brief. Each is reasonable taken alone. His flight chief, a senior master sergeant, has run the flight for two years. He asks what you think.
Mark the most effective and the least effective action.
Show the answer
Most effective: Have him pick the one change that matters most, settle it with his flight chief, and hold the rest
Least effective: Wish him luck with Monday, as a flight teaches a new lieutenant faster than a captain can
Having him pick one change and settle it with his flight chief leaves the choice his and teaches him a pace.
Wishing him luck lets a foreseeable mistake fall on his flight and on his standing with his flight chief.
Sending him to his flight chief with the whole list comes close, but leaves the pace unanswered.
Scenario 3 of 5
At four in the afternoon the flight commander next door asks you for four of your airmen tonight, to finish preparing his shop for an inspection at seven tomorrow morning. The need is real, and his flight cannot do it alone. Your people have had a long week, and your flight chief tells you that they have earned their evening. Nothing in your flight's own work suffers if four people go tonight, and tomorrow is a full day for your flight as well.
Mark the most effective and the least effective action.
Show the answer
Most effective: Give the four the flight chief picks a Friday afternoon off next week, and send them over tonight
Least effective: Tell the flight commander next door that your people have earned their evening and have a full day tomorrow
Sending the four tonight with a Friday afternoon off next week meets the need in full and pays them on a day the flight can afford.
Refusing turns down a real need when your own work can spare four people tonight.
A morning off tomorrow pays them too, but takes it out of a full day.
Scenario 4 of 5
On Monday you told your flight chief to have the shop ready for the group commander's visit on Friday. On Thursday afternoon you walk through the shop: it is clean and tidy, and none of the equipment you meant to show is set up. The flight chief understood ready as tidy. Setting up the equipment takes a full evening's work, and the shift ends in two hours.
Mark the most effective and the least effective action.
Show the answer
Most effective: Tell the flight chief that your order was unclear, say what tomorrow needs, and work out with him what can be done tonight
Least effective: Tell your commander tonight that the shop will not be as planned, as the flight chief took ready to mean tidy and nothing more
Owning the unclear order, saying what the visit needs and planning tonight with the flight chief keeps him in the fix.
Telling your commander that the flight chief misread you passes your own unclear order up as his mistake, before anyone has tried to fix it.
Owning the gap and asking what can still be set up comes close, but never says what the visit needs.
Scenario 5 of 5
At the group staff meeting this morning, your commander told the group commander that your flight's maintenance backlog was cleared. It is not: about thirty jobs remain, and they will take until Friday. Last week he said that he expected it cleared by now, and you did not tell him that it had slipped. The group commander noted the news and moved on. The meeting is still going.
Mark the most effective and the least effective action.
Show the answer
Most effective: Send your commander the remaining count and the Friday date before the meeting ends, with an apology for the late update
Least effective: Clear the backlog first and let the matter rest, with the statement true again before anyone acts on it
A message before the meeting ends gives your commander the true count and your part in it while he can still correct the record himself.
Clearing the backlog and saying nothing means he never learns that he misled the group.
Telling him right after the meeting owns the lapse as fully, but lets the statement stand through the rest of it.
The Frontline Forge trainer
-
The full ranking
In Training mode, after each situation, the trainer ranks the five actions from best to worst, marks your two picks with their points and explains the ranking. The clock stops until you move on.
-
The real format
Test mode runs 25 situations in 35 minutes, the count and time of the real subtest, and scores each judgment by the rank of the action you picked, from −1 to +1. The five situations above come from the trainer, and each Test draws 25 of its 200 situations across the six competencies.
-
Ranked against other test-takers
Each score is ranked against the scores of other test-takers. The Statistics page plots the ranking of every attempt, so you see whether you are beating more test-takers than before.